The hypothetical agreement signed between the company RSUs and Sigma Tau has achieved a certain result: the harmony and unity between all the workers no longer exists. The glue of these 41 days, or a common goal set to safeguard all jobs, is melting. On the one hand there are the people who think that this agreement is an excellent result, on the other hand those who believe that it has not accepted any of the requests made above all by the employees in CGIS. Employees who are gradually choosing different paths: there are those who have felt deceived by the unions ("We were notified of the hypothesis of an agreement through a text message which told us that we would have to vote for it at 3.00 pm on the same day, without even having time to figure out what was written. We refused, and only with difficulty did we get a copy of what was signed during the night. The next day, in the assembly, instead of having a discussion table, we found the ballot boxes…") and yes is addressed to a lawyer, and who instead defends the work of the Rsu staunchly ("They worked day and night for us and with us, only thanks to their coordination we managed to bring out our situation at a national level and to force the "company to negotiate: why are we now treating them as if they were traitors? Signing this agreement is the only possible way to be able to hope for a future in Sigma Tau"). Meanwhile, the lawyer Antonio Pileggi, chosen by the ISF for any lawsuits to be brought against the company, has announced the position of his clients with respect to the agreement through a long letter.
"The sham agreement - reads the document - signed by the parties on the night of 23 February 2012 is absolutely unacceptable, because it was passed off by those who signed it as a victory, as the agreement that has already "concluded the dispute", with the evident aim of displacing the workers, and presenting them with a fait accompli”. “The contents of the agreement – continues the document – have not been subject to prior discussion and approval by all workers, especially by those who, having already been unilaterally and arbitrarily suspended, are already suffering the harmful consequences. The trade unions, before sitting down at the negotiating table, should have demanded the unconditional and immediate revocation of all the measures to suspend workers: only in this way would the workers have been placed on the same level, in the same state of mind, and would have able to express his point of view serenely, while, in the current situation, the vote will inevitably be invalidated by the mors tua vita mea principle, and whoever is safe for the moment will be led to vote in favor of the agreement, not because shares the contents, but because he is led to think that only in this way will he be able to save himself".
“The agreement – explains the lawyer – follows downwards the conditions already decided unilaterally by the company management, as is clear from the comparison between the hypothetical agreement dated February 23rd and the company press release dated February 14th. In the hypothesis of an agreement, incredibly, it is envisaged that the integration of the redundancy payment advanced by the employer is to be paid by the worker and not by the employer: the worker, therefore, pays the integration out of his own pocket with advances on your TFR. Not to mention that alone
