![](https://www.fedaiisf.it/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Sergio-Venturi.jpg)
The president of the Bologna medical association, Giancarlo Pizza, has initiated disciplinary proceedings against Sergio Venturi, a doctor and regional health councilor for Emilia-Romagna. It is the latest twist in a war that has been dragging on for two years now. A sensational own goal
, according to the Order of Nurses of Bologna.
Bologna, Pizza-Venturi clash: disciplinary procedure for the commissioner
An institutional clash between the Region and the Order born of the decision of the Bonaccini Council of reform the emergency system, providing for ambulances with only specialized nurses on board and no longer doctors which was also reached the Senate.
A provision against which Pizza has railed from the beginning, going as far as to suspend in recent years the leaders of the emergency-urgency of the Bologna Local Health Authority for having applied the regional resolution, including the then medical director of the health company, Angelo Fioritti.
Venturi himself announced the disciplinary measure of the order, today during a press conference in the Region on vaccines. There is no precedent – Venturi counterattacks – anti-politics is now so brazen and arrogant as to reach such a point. It is a clearly illegitimate decision, on which my lawyers will work
.
Bonaccini with Venturi: Incomprehensible provision
The president of Emilia-Romagna, Stefano Bonaccini, is in solidarity with his councilor Sergio Venturi. Together - Bonaccini says in a note - we intend to continue strengthening our regional, public and universal health service, for the benefit of patients, their families, those who work there and the entire regional community
.
The disciplinary measure opened by the president of the Bologna medical association against the councilor Sergio Venturi for an act that he proposed and which was adopted by the regional council - continues Bonaccini - I think it goes far beyond the understandable
.
A measure political-administrative for which he is responsible as a councilor subject to the deontological judgment of a professional order, as if Venturi instead of in the full capacity of his functions as councilor had acted as a doctor
.