As usual, they refer to the ANAC recommendations and since by definition the ISF are corruptors, access must be limited and not regulated.
It is reiterated that our activity must not hinder that of the doctor, by definition we hinder we do not support, and consequently we are received after work.
A colleague wrote to us: “It seems to me ridiculous to tolerate the ANAC recommendations beyond and accept the access restrictions. I exist to provide information on drug use so I have to work every day and be punished if I promote abuse. They must share how to work with us.
A limit is the law that imposes 5/6 visits a year everywhere, a law made on basic medicine and as usual punitive and harmful to the dignity of the worker“.
Another writes to us: “The parapharmaceutical colleagues are cut off because, since there is no obligation for them, the Region does not issue endorsed cards. So those issued by parapharmaceutical companies to their collaborators "would not be compliant"... The conditional is a must...
There cannot be penalized professionals and others not. In this case and in this hospital there will be… Or, as usual, it will end in the Italian style….”
Yet another tells us: “This inconsistency is well known in some implementing regulations of various Local Health Authorities/Departments/Hospitals etc. of Emilia Romagna, because the logic that the gentlemen who conceived them have followed is that of limiting/obstructing/tracing the visits of the ISF because they are considered "expense inducers" while for what is paraphrase/supplement etc., in the majority of cases there are no limitations/traceability of visits because these products are not paid for by the NHS/SSR“
So in fact there is discrimination between all professionals based on what they have in the bag. Discriminations of the opposite sign, but there are always discriminations.
