We receive and publish:
Since it is not electorally convenient to save on the cost of personnel, one tries - in every way - to save by violating the rights of citizens.
We want to make believe that the squanderers of public resources lurk precisely among the users of welfare services.
In particular the elderly, who - certainly - have greater needs for use.
Action has been taken on medicines: through decree laws, forcing pharmacists and doctors, with not too veiled threats, to support and prescribe non-original medicines.
Action is being taken with the disposal of wards, small decentralized hospitals and non-economically productive structures.
With the result of evident potential risks for those who live in decentralized countries or in difficult geographical locations.
We want to intervene on the analyses: they make too many of them useless, even if I have a terrible suspicion that someone could take advantage of them to support the uselessness equation directly proportional to the costs.
Bad word the "prevention".
Are we over 80? “Therapeutic obstinacy is useless.”
Better to accompany these elderly people to the final goal without, perhaps, making them suffer…
Our mothers, fathers, grandparents -certainly- suddenly become bulky shopping centres.
Woe to squander public money.
Prime Minister, Minister of Health, General Managers of the Local Health Authorities: perhaps you have all forgotten that that money is ours.
We paid them month after month, year after year with great effort and we didn't give "copied" money; they forced us to delegate the State to manage them, to use them in times of need.
If I want to have a CT scan because my knee hurts, I don't have to ask the authorization of any Director General: otherwise we would violate elementary rights.
If the politicians have spent our money doing something else, drawing on the relief funds, it will be necessary to explain it to the workers, who have supported the system.
There was talk of savings through the unification of cost centers and price comparisons between the various regions, to choose the most convenient material with the same quality: it is possible that -in the age of computers- it is so difficult to verify and compare costs?
There are three possible things: either you don't know or you don't want to or you can't do.
There's also a fourth possibility I don't want to think about: mistakes or negligence; in both cases the public prosecutors should be involved as far as they are concerned.
Fabio Carinci – 09/11/2015
Related news: Beatrice Lorenzin: "Those who can pay for the antibiotic do so: it's a question of civilization"
