Historical Archive

Stability Law. Green light from the House to trust the provision. Final vote tonight

(http://www.dottnet.it/canale.aspx?idcanale=2139&idtipocontenuto=1&idcontenuto=12136)
Source: Ministry of Economy, Ministry of Health

COMMENTS
Arturo Cilio wrote: but how has the state managed to save on drugs if it pays, now as before, the lowest price of the drug and the rest, if due, is paid by the citizen? Are you kidding us? Whoever wrote the article demonstrates where the state has recovered with the generic policy because the obligation favors a whole series of generic companies with almost no evidence of in vivo bioequivalence. Arthur Cilius
8 hours ago
FRANCO FANTINI wrote: SAVING ON YOUR HEALTH AND CONTINUE TO SPIN IN OTHER SECTORS IS IMMORAL TO say the least. IF SERVICES WITHOUT WAITING LISTS ARE IMPROVED OVER ONE YEAR, THE SICK WOULD NOT NEED TO GO TO THE ED TO SPEED UP A SERVICE: THE REASON FOR ACCESS IS THIS, CERTAINLY NOT THE LACK OF AVAILABILITY OF THE GP! BUT A PUNITIVE DETERRENT HAS ALSO BEEN INVENTED: THE TICKET. THEY TOLD ME THAT POLITICIANS HAVE A POLICY PAID BY US TO BE ABLE TO TREAT WHERE THEY WANT!!! FRANCO FANTINI.
19 hours ago
Antonio Domenico De Vuono wrote: Tell it to those who are naïve like you. Or worse in bad faith. I made 36 reports of non-effectiveness of generics. And since I'm responsible I DO NOT PRESCRIBE generics. You do.
yesterday, 21:05
Bartolomeo Delzotti wrote: a definitive clarification would be appropriate once and for all. The minister or someone on his behalf clearly explains through which mechanisms the State saves money if generics are used, given that the difference in cost is borne by the citizen. Bartolomeo Delzotti
yesterday, 20:17
Bartolomeo Delzotti wrote: a definitive clarification would be appropriate once and for all. The minister or someone on his behalf clearly explains through which mechanisms the State saves money if generics are used, given that the difference in cost is borne by the citizen. Bartolomeo Delzotti
yesterday, 20:17
Andrea Fontanella wrote: I would just like to understand why the state saves money with generics, given that the regional health agencies always reimburse pharmacies the same amount: whether it's generics, branded medicines, generic drug. On the contrary, in the case of branded products, the Regions even reimburse with a lower percentage. Generics are only allowed to introduce an "indirect ticket". So whoever loses economically with branded is only the citizen, and he does so by his own free choice. Andrew Fontanelle
yesterday, 19:42

ANSWER
Nothing, of course.
 

Articoli correlati

Back to top button
Fedaiisf Federazione delle Associazioni Italiane degli Informatori Scientifici del Farmaco e del Parafarmaco