Monopolies: "family doctors have already achieved their national spending targets"
“The further reduction in pharmaceutical expenditure imposed by the Region on family doctors risks resulting in damage to citizens' health. – continues Monopoli – budget constraints cannot be to the detriment of citizens' health. In addition to economic goals, you have to worry about health goals.”
As the Judgment 8254 of 03/02/2011 of the Court of Cassation underlines, " [...] no one is allowed to put the economic logic before the logic of health protection, nor to issue directives which, while respecting the former, put the patient's needs in the background [...] its professionalism and its mission at an accounting level”.
“It is not clear why aiming to restrict the prescribing freedom of doctors, pushing for lower cost drugs and constantly questioning the appropriateness, evaluated only from an economic point of view. This way of proceeding is disrespectful towards the medical profession and also ends up having negative effects on the health of patients.” continues Monopoly.
“The impression is that, given the need to cut down on health care costs to recover 47.5 million euros by the end of the year, family doctors are indicated as responsible for the increase in spending. To reach
After all, when the reduction in spending ends up compressing health needs, there is the risk of triggering a vicious circle: in fact, the surveys show that in the Regions with a recovery plan there is greater recourse to the prescriptions of conventional medicine and access to general medicine. This means that health needs that are not answered in other sectors of the health service are directed towards freely accessible services such as family medicine.
Related news: More money to councilors, Puglia politicians vote on the increase on Tuesday: the yes of Emiliano's lists
Tighten on medicines in Puglia, the goal is a saving of almost 8 million