On the newspaper "Iacchitè" of 4 July (and also reported on Facebook) a letter from an unspecified ISF was published, which he did not sign, and which we report below:
Cosenza, scientific informants on a war footing: “Only Freemasons can enter the Annunziata. Guarantees De Paola”
egr. Director,
I am writing on behalf of about 200 scientific representatives from Cosenza who are not members of any association.
I wanted to tell you the latest crap implemented by the current medical director Dr. Salvatore De Paola and by
You must know that due to provisions due to Covid, thousands of Cosenza are not allowed to enter the hospital to make visits, except for urgent visits. So many doctors and nurses have continued since 6 March to idle, in the various departments, and above all to take salaries without doing anything, but the equally serious thing is that, being our category of scientific representatives paid to work in the structures, a high group of us are not allowed to enter because we are not members of an officially unrecognized association, but above all of a political pro-Masonic association (about 30 members).
Dr. Esposito, president of this association, decided together with Dr. De Paola, medical director, to let these 30 informants enter with a list communicated to the Health Authority and not to let in another 200 informants, with dependent families and risk of dismissals from pharmaceutical companies, in a public place open to all, to facilitate only these thirty members with political and Masonic quarrels and threatening us non-members not to let us enter the hospital again with the risk of losing our jobs.
I thank you from now on for your kindness.
Signed Letter"
Surprised and amazed, my colleague Esposito thus replied with a letter tomedia body who posted it like this:
“Cosenza, informatori scientifici. Diritto di replica all’associazione Fedaiisf”
egr. Director,
I am Lello Esposito, president of FEDAIISF Cosenza, as well as correspondent of the "badass" perpetrated against other colleagues, in shared responsibility with dr. DePaola.
I won't hide from you the profound sense of embarrassment that pervades me as I write this letter. I'm almost 70 years old and never, ever, have I seen myself forced to list facts in defense of my person and of the Association that I have the honor of representing, which has 76 members.
I take this opportunity, starting from the previously published article, to make manifest what occurred a few days ago, during the meeting with dr. De Paola, which was also attended by my colleague, Dr. Deborah Malizia.
I start by saying that, after having worked for over 30 years as a drug sales representative, I am currently retired. However, I continue to honor the position of president of the aforementioned association, free of charge, because I consider it a moral duty to be at the service of my colleagues, especially the younger ones.
The Association, officially recognized, is open to all informants. The participation cost is negligible: it amounts, in fact, to about 35 euros per year. I myself, several times, have urged my non-member colleagues to be part of it.
Ours is a profession which, alas, is often misunderstood and stigmatized. In fact, dignity is continually not recognized in our role in the health sector: we are the figures responsible for informing and updating the doctor about the characteristics and evolution of the drugs we present.
Hence the importance and necessity of associations: united and numerous, we can protect ourselves and make citizens aware of the relevance of the work we do.
I come to the facts. As president and therefore delegate, I had an interview with Dr. De Paola, in order to be able to restore the access of scientific informants within the Cosenza hospital, during the ongoing Covid emergency.
I was therefore asked how many informants were present in the area, since the Hospital Company had the objective need to regulate access in a precise and unequivocal manner, so as to also allow the informants themselves to organize their daily work itineraries.
I was able to provide precise numbers and names of the members registered in the association, precisely because they are quantifiable. However, I specified that there were many more acting on the territory and that the non-members had the same need as the members, for access to the hospital, since they were all scientific informants.
It was not possible for me to provide precise names of non-members because, as there is no register for our profession (a goal we try to pursue through FEDAIISF), I cannot be aware of the identity of all the colleagues who carry out this job.
In summary, since the scheduling of hospital accesses was necessary, given the Covid emergency, I have provided the list of names in my possession, namely that of the members of the association. But I reiterated, however, that this need was also shared by non-members.
These are the facts, for which my colleague Dr. Malizia is willing to provide her testimony.
In the published article, we are defined as belonging to a political pro-Masonic association. I wonder what the transparency and precision, of which I have been a guarantor, have to do with Freemasonry and, even more, with a certain policy from which I have always distanced myself and continue to distance myself.
I also ask my colleague, author of the letter published in Iacchitè, if his actions comply with the principles of correctness which I practice. I confess that this last question baffles and pains me at the same time, since whoever defames an association (born to protect the profession) and my person disqualifies and devalues the importance and role of scientific information, in a extremely delicate moment for us.
These days we should aggregate, not demolish. Precisely because all colleagues experience great uncertainty about their future work.
I owed so much, to the work of all my colleagues, and there are many, ethically correct.
Best regards
Lello Esposito”
N.d.R.: ineccepibile la lettera di replica del collega Esposito alle deliranti, paranoiche e non dimostrate accuse di “lettera firmata”.
From what has been stated that's all facilmente verificabile: non è vero che Fedaiisf Cosenza ha 30 iscritti, non è vero che Esposito parlava solo per conto di 30 iscritti, del tutto fantasiosa e priva di fondamento e ovviamente non dimostrabile l’appartenenza massonico-politica di chicchessia, ci manca solo il complotto pluto-giudaico-massonico, il 5G, Bill Gates, e altre amenità del genere.
Here we just want to add that there is a crime of defamation in which the active subject is undoubtedly the author of the publication from which the offense derives. The penal code, however, in addition to the responsibility of the author, provides for the attribution of the charge also to other subjects: the responsible director or deputy director, who fails to exercise the necessary control to prevent that by means of publication crimes are committed (art. 57 criminal code) and in the case of a non-periodical body, if the author of the publication is unknown or not attributable, to the publisher, or, if the publisher is not indicated or is not attributable, to the printer ( Article 57bis of the Criminal Code).
It will be good for those in charge of Iacchitè to take the necessary measures
Note: give her Guidelines of the Conference of Regions
– L’Ordine dei medici;
– L’Ordine dei farmacisti;
– I Medici di medicina generale;
– I Pediatri di libera scelta;
– I medici dipendenti del SSN;
– L’azienda Sanitaria ;
– Farmindustria;
– The associations of scientific representatives;
A dette commissioni deve essere demandata, ad integrazione della informazione scientifica prodotta dall’industria farmaceutica, la programmazione e realizzazione, anche in collaborazione con l’industria farmaceutica, di incontri, con tutti i sanitari che operano nel bacino di utenza, su specifici temi legati all’impiego dei medicinali”. Fedaiisf, an ISF association, is fully entitled to represent the ISF category cosa che non è “lettera firmata” che può parlare solo a titolo personale